7:14 AM
admin
This was said by PT Bank Danamon Tbk economist Anton Gunawan, in a discussion of CSIS in office, Palmerah, Jakarta, Tuesday (07/13/2011).
"Like two sides of the blade. The goal, for good corporate governance but there is also another thing where if some banks to 90% broken was the owner then later feared would limit the space for the bank," he said.
"There will be cross-ownership of the edges are stuck money market, some banks do not lend mutual funds because of the many holdings. And the danger is that the transition towards a low kempemilikan," said Anton.
But Anton confirmed, this majority shareholding arrangements are necessary for the interests of good corporate governance.
"Ownership banks should be regulated, especially for family-owned banks. Bank fraud that occurred not because of competition precisely because the policy of family-run, his brother and other family," said Anton
The same place, Researcher of the Directorate of Banking Research and Regulation of BI, Suhaedi assert ownership of a majority stake in the regulation of BI will not differentiate between foreign and domestic.
"BI will not distinguish between foreign and domestic. This concept is also not happening in Indonesia but there have been in other countries," said Suhaedi.
As is known, Previously, BI was completed studies limit the maximum individual ownership of the banking industry. The central bank hopes in the future no longer a bank owned by individuals and families as 'troublesome'.
"That's one of the priorities, set the correct ownership of the bank perseroangan. This principle, we are also a lot of information, many question the dominant role of banks caused one of two people. So, no form of checks and balances bank management," said BI Deputy Governor Muliaman Hadad some time ago . (Dru / Qom) source: detik.com
please give me comments thanks
Posted in: 
0 comments:
Post a Comment